<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Branding the Macarthur region	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.phansw.org.au/branding-the-macarthur-region/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.phansw.org.au/branding-the-macarthur-region/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=branding-the-macarthur-region</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 09:51:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bruce Baskerville		</title>
		<link>https://www.phansw.org.au/branding-the-macarthur-region/#comment-18400</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Baskerville]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2014 04:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phansw.org.au/?p=1354#comment-18400</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks Ian, much to think about in a regional place name.  I have been looking (on and off) and the origins of the place name Western Sydney, which it seems has largely moved with the urban edge as a description rather than a place name.  In the form of West Sydney it initially meant the western side of the City of Sydney in the 1850s, and an electorate name for many years (Billy Hughes being one if its more memorable federal MPs).  

In the inter-war years West Sydney or Western Suburbs or western suburbs or western Sydney meant what we now call the Inner West.  The earliest use of Western Sydney (with capital W and S) that I have so far found is in 1961 when Prospect County Council used the term to describe the region in which its distributed electricity.  In a 1962 advertisement (Nepean Times 18 October 1962) the County Council included a map of Western Sydney where it supplied 114,000 consumers in the Parramatta, Penrith, Liverpool, Blacktown, Fairfield, Holroyd, Windsor, Baulkham Hills and Colo council areas.  Interestingly, they did not include Camden, Campbelltown and Picton areas.  

Much more work to do, but Western Sydney as a place name is, I think, historically quite recent and, as you note, contested in many places to which it is applied.  I would like to look at the decline of Cumberland as a regional name (the County of Cumberland was formally established on 4 June 1788) and its replacement with Western Sydney – I suspect the relationship is not that simple or straight forward.  I wonder if Cumberland will rise again once day to indicate a region with its own identity rather than being an appendage of Sydney as the name Western/western/west Sydney implies, and perhaps a name which its constituent areas could more readily identify with?  Cumberland International Airport anyone!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ian, much to think about in a regional place name.  I have been looking (on and off) and the origins of the place name Western Sydney, which it seems has largely moved with the urban edge as a description rather than a place name.  In the form of West Sydney it initially meant the western side of the City of Sydney in the 1850s, and an electorate name for many years (Billy Hughes being one if its more memorable federal MPs).  </p>
<p>In the inter-war years West Sydney or Western Suburbs or western suburbs or western Sydney meant what we now call the Inner West.  The earliest use of Western Sydney (with capital W and S) that I have so far found is in 1961 when Prospect County Council used the term to describe the region in which its distributed electricity.  In a 1962 advertisement (Nepean Times 18 October 1962) the County Council included a map of Western Sydney where it supplied 114,000 consumers in the Parramatta, Penrith, Liverpool, Blacktown, Fairfield, Holroyd, Windsor, Baulkham Hills and Colo council areas.  Interestingly, they did not include Camden, Campbelltown and Picton areas.  </p>
<p>Much more work to do, but Western Sydney as a place name is, I think, historically quite recent and, as you note, contested in many places to which it is applied.  I would like to look at the decline of Cumberland as a regional name (the County of Cumberland was formally established on 4 June 1788) and its replacement with Western Sydney – I suspect the relationship is not that simple or straight forward.  I wonder if Cumberland will rise again once day to indicate a region with its own identity rather than being an appendage of Sydney as the name Western/western/west Sydney implies, and perhaps a name which its constituent areas could more readily identify with?  Cumberland International Airport anyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Katherine Knight		</title>
		<link>https://www.phansw.org.au/branding-the-macarthur-region/#comment-18058</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katherine Knight]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 04:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phansw.org.au/?p=1354#comment-18058</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Some interesting observations Ian, probably reflected in similar experiences and attitudes in the Hills Shire to the north west of Sydney and the Blue Mountains LGA to the west. Yet the three LGAs of the Macarthur region (Macarthur Region Organisation of Councils - MACROC) and the 11 members of the Western Region Organisation of Councils (WESROC) continue to comprise the 14 LGAs of of the region designated Greater Western Sydney - an area roughly 80 kms east/west and 100 kms north/south - with a population of 2 million. In recent years, the Hills Shire has withdrawn from WESROC, but I believe that it has done that before and later returned to the fold. It may do so again. 
You are right that regionalism is a touchy issue, but 40 years ago, it was recognised that unless councils advocated jointly for better funding, infrastructure etc, through ROCs, their solo efforts had insufficient power to bring results. It&#039;s an ongoing issue and one that causes continuing frustration and anger for many people in the region - see my recent blog posting ttp://westsydneyfront.wordpress.com/2014/03/12/stop-blaming-locals-for-government-dysfunction/?preview=true&#038;preview_id=243&#038;preview_nonce=90eabcec35&#038;post_format=standard]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some interesting observations Ian, probably reflected in similar experiences and attitudes in the Hills Shire to the north west of Sydney and the Blue Mountains LGA to the west. Yet the three LGAs of the Macarthur region (Macarthur Region Organisation of Councils &#8211; MACROC) and the 11 members of the Western Region Organisation of Councils (WESROC) continue to comprise the 14 LGAs of of the region designated Greater Western Sydney &#8211; an area roughly 80 kms east/west and 100 kms north/south &#8211; with a population of 2 million. In recent years, the Hills Shire has withdrawn from WESROC, but I believe that it has done that before and later returned to the fold. It may do so again.<br />
You are right that regionalism is a touchy issue, but 40 years ago, it was recognised that unless councils advocated jointly for better funding, infrastructure etc, through ROCs, their solo efforts had insufficient power to bring results. It&#8217;s an ongoing issue and one that causes continuing frustration and anger for many people in the region &#8211; see my recent blog posting ttp://westsydneyfront.wordpress.com/2014/03/12/stop-blaming-locals-for-government-dysfunction/?preview=true&amp;preview_id=243&amp;preview_nonce=90eabcec35&amp;post_format=standard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
